Undergraduate SearchInfoHome
Return to Undergraduate HomeRequest a ScheduleQuestions and Comments

Tech Resource Home • Cross Curricular Initiatives
Effective Writing
 
  Contact: Jim Booth
   
 
Operational Definition
 

Effective writing for UMUC graduates is the ability to communicate appropriately within the discourse conventions of disciplinary fields as well as within differing cultural contexts.

Effective writing meets the needs of the reader, accomplishes the writer's purposes, adequately covers the subject, uses expected conventions of format and organization, demonstrates use of credible reasoning and evidence, and satisfies standards of style and grammatical correctness.
   
Student Competencies
Earning a bachelor's degree from UMUC means that the graduate has acquired certain knowledge and developed certain skills. The writing competence of UMUC graduates will be assessed by the following grading criteria:
   
 

Grade of A
An A paper is characterized by outstanding informative writing marked by superior readability and competent handling of content. These traits are demonstrated in the following ways:

  • The substance and organization follow a clear, logical sequence that makes the information easily accessible to the reader.
  • The purpose is clearly expressed, and the selected details of the assignment reflect this purpose.
  • The audience is accommodated throughout the assignment as reflected in effective communication and style.
  • Words are chosen and sentences are constructed to make the information understandable.
  • The grammar, mechanics, and format are flawless.
   
 

Grade of B
A B paper is characterized by distinguished writing that successfully fulfills the requirements but contains one of the following weaknesses:

  • Although the writing is essentially well organized, the audience analysis, the statement of purpose, or the handling of the content is flawed.
  • Although sentences are grammatically correct, their structure or length or both sometimes cause readers to work unnecessarily hard.
  • Ambiguous or vague wording hinders precise communication.
  • A small lapse in audience accommodation causes reader distraction.
  • Grammar, mechanics, and format flaws interfere with reading and comprehension.
   
 

Grade of C
A C paper is characterized by satisfactory writing that is generally effective but contains any one of the following weaknesses:

  • Although satisfactorily written, the body of the assignment is not clearly organized, or some material is not clearly explained; the audience and purpose are not clear.
  • Sentences, although they are grammatically correct, often make information difficult to extract; editing key words or converting nouns to verbs could solve such problems.
  • Wording interferes with readability, but the reader can still glean the meaning; rereading is often required.
  • Repeated grammar, mechanics, or format errors mar the paper.
   
 

Grade of D
A D paper struggles to communicate information and contains weak writing. In a professional working environment, such writing would be considered incompetent because it suffers from any one of the following problems:

  • Any two of the problems listed under a C paper.
  • Minimal evidence of audience accommodation.
  • Serious wording problems, such as garbled wording, gives the reader repeated and serious difficulties in understanding.
  • Serious sentence problems, such as run-on sentences and comma splices, damage the readability.
  • Grammar, spelling, or format problems create frequent obstacles to understanding.
   
  Grade of F
A failing grade on a writing assignment usually means that the paper contains any two problems from the list for a D paper.
   
Examples of Class Activities
  The effective writing cross-curricular initiative begins with the general education requirement of ENGL 101 Introduction to Writing, another writing course, a third course in writing or speech, and an upper-level intensive writing course (see the Undergraduate Catalog). In addition, academic disciplines can incorporate class activities such as the following to support integration of effective writing into specific courses.

These strategies assume, first, that one of the best ways to encourage students to learn the content of any discipline is to have them write about it; second, that the ability to write well must be learned by constantly engaging in the process of writing in courses across the college or university curriculum.

   
  Connections
  Provide students with the beginning and end of a process, a causal relationship, or an argument. In scientific or technical courses it may be the beginning and end of a design process (the problem and a potential solution), or the beginning and end of a chemical experiment. In math courses, it may be the beginning and end of a proof. In social sciences it may be the hypothesis and potential results from an experiment or the proposition and conclusion of an ideological argument. In a history course, you may give students two potentially related events in history. In an English course you may present students with a character and a character's actions. Have students get into groups and trace or explain the how the two elements are related or how one leads to the other. (This may look like a series of propositions, calculations, processes, or personal choices). Ask one member of each small group to share his or her findings with the entire class. Note: students can be asked to write out their responses before class, as homework.
   
  Unresolved Lab or Shop Problems
  At the end of a lab or shop period, have students write a list of difficulties or problems encountered during the period. Then have students exchange these problem descriptions and spend 5 minutes helping each other solve their respective problems. Unresolved problems should be handed in for discussion.
   
  Debate on Propositions
  On the board, put several pairs of opposing propositions related to the topic of the day or the readings (or propositions that articulate possible outcomes of experiments, solutions to problems, or proposed methods of design, for example). Have students individually write for three minutes either supporting or refuting one of the propositions. Then pair students up with someone who wrote on the opposing proposition and ask students to take 1 minute to present their argument. Then ask students to respond to their partners.
   
  Mini-Cases
  Design short, stimulating case problems from the subject matter. Ask students to respond to the case in one page. You may consider designing the case so that students write letters or other documents to "real" audiences. Then get students into pairs and have them discuss their documents with each other.
   
  Exam Preparation
  Circulate a list of conceptually difficult questions focusing on the material in a unit, course, etc. Ask students to write 1/2-1 page explanations for each question. In class, have the students work in groups or pairs; they must read each other's explanations and discuss any differences they see between them. In a follow-up discussion with the entire class, ask for consensus on the toughest questions; then lead a discussion from students' explanations, clarifying where needed and reviewing the material.

Two or three class periods before each exam in the course, have students bring in questions they have generated from the course material. If the exam uses essay topics, students must generate one such topic. If the exam uses objective-type questions (multiple-choice, true-false, etc.), students must generate three such questions. When the students arrive, they form small groups of three or four and exchange questions. Working their way through the questions, the students discuss possible answers (for essays) or try answering the objective questions and explain their answers to each other. The instructor chooses the best question or two from each group to include on the exam.

   
  Web Search
  After attending a class or doing a reading assignment, students search the Web for anything that connects in some way with the material. Students must bring in a print-out of the relevant page(s) at the site and then write up a brief summary of how the web source connects to the reading.
   
Resources
  UMUC Resources
  http://www.umuc.edu/prog/ugp/ewp_writingcenter/writinggde/welcome.shtml
  (UMUC's own Guide to Effective Writing)
   
  http://www.umuc.edu/prog/ugp/ewp_writingcenter/wc_home.html
(UMUC's Effective Writing Center - On-line)
   
  http://www.inform.umd.edu/EdRes/Colleges/ARHU/Depts/English/Resources/WritCenter/
  (UMCP's on-site Writing Center - students from UMUC may use this center and may arrange visits by visiting the web site)
   
  FAQ's, Guidelines and General Help
  http://cstw.ohio-state.edu/wac/wac_faq.htm
(Good general information source from Ohio State)
   
  http://cisw.cla.umn.edu/faculty/wicourses/guidelines.html
(Great set of guidelines from U. of Minnesota)
   
  http://mwp01.mwp.hawaii.edu/wi-hallmarks.htm
(University of Hawaii guidelines - excellent)
   
  http://wac.colostate.edu/exchange/
(Colorado State is home to the WAC Clearinghouse - the Teacher Exchange has sample exercises and tips for using writing in every discipline)
 
  Other Helpful Sites
  http://owl.english.purdue.edu/
(Every kind of on-line assistance for every kind of discipline - especially good with sciences and technologies)
   
  http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/CWSP/
(Campus Writing and Speaking Program at NC State University - great resources and structure)
   
  http://www.siu.edu/departments/cac/
(wonderful WAC/CAC site at Southern Illinois - lots of resources)
   
  http://www.sfasu.edu/lalac/
(The Language and Learning Across the Curriculum Site -a mother lode of information for using writing, speaking, and communicating by other media in the disciplines)

© 1996-2005 University of Maryland University College
3501 University Blvd. East
Adelphi, Maryland 20783 USA

Contact Us