 |
Operational
Definition |
| |
Effective
writing for UMUC graduates is the ability to communicate
appropriately within the discourse conventions
of disciplinary fields as well as within differing
cultural contexts.
Effective
writing meets the needs of the reader, accomplishes
the writer's purposes, adequately covers the subject,
uses expected conventions of format and organization,
demonstrates use of credible reasoning and evidence,
and satisfies standards of style and grammatical correctness. |
| |
|
 |
Student
Competencies |
|
Earning
a bachelor's degree from UMUC means that the graduate
has acquired certain knowledge and developed certain
skills. The writing competence of UMUC graduates
will be assessed by the following grading criteria: |
| |
|
| |
Grade
of A
An A paper
is characterized by outstanding informative
writing marked by superior readability and
competent handling of content. These traits
are demonstrated in the following ways:
- The
substance and organization follow a clear, logical
sequence that makes the information easily accessible
to the reader.
- The
purpose is clearly expressed, and the selected
details of the assignment reflect this purpose.
- The
audience is accommodated throughout the assignment
as reflected in effective communication and style.
- Words
are chosen and sentences are constructed to make
the information understandable.
- The
grammar, mechanics, and format are flawless.
|
| |
|
| |
Grade
of B
A B paper is characterized by distinguished writing
that successfully fulfills the requirements but contains
one of the following weaknesses:
- Although
the writing is essentially well organized, the
audience analysis, the statement of purpose,
or the handling of the content is flawed.
- Although
sentences are grammatically correct, their structure
or length or both sometimes cause readers to
work unnecessarily hard.
- Ambiguous
or vague wording hinders precise communication.
- A
small lapse in audience accommodation causes
reader distraction.
- Grammar,
mechanics, and format flaws interfere with reading
and comprehension.
|
| |
|
| |
Grade
of C
A C paper is characterized by satisfactory writing
that is generally effective but contains any one of the
following weaknesses:
- Although
satisfactorily written, the body of the assignment
is not clearly organized, or some material is
not clearly explained; the audience and purpose
are not clear.
- Sentences,
although they are grammatically correct, often
make information difficult to extract; editing
key words or converting nouns to verbs could
solve such problems.
- Wording
interferes with readability, but the reader can
still glean the meaning; rereading is often required.
- Repeated
grammar, mechanics, or format errors mar the
paper.
|
| |
|
| |
Grade
of D
A D paper struggles to communicate information
and contains weak writing. In a professional working
environment, such writing would be considered incompetent
because it suffers from any one of the following problems:
- Any
two of the problems listed under a C paper.
- Minimal
evidence of audience accommodation.
- Serious
wording problems, such as garbled wording, gives
the reader repeated and serious difficulties
in understanding.
- Serious
sentence problems, such as run-on sentences and
comma splices, damage the readability.
- Grammar,
spelling, or format problems create frequent
obstacles to understanding.
|
| |
|
| |
Grade
of F
A failing grade on a writing assignment usually means that
the paper contains any two problems from the list for a
D paper. |
| |
|
 |
Examples
of Class Activities |
| |
The
effective writing cross-curricular initiative begins
with the general education requirement of ENGL 101
Introduction to Writing, another writing course,
a third course in writing or speech, and an upper-level
intensive writing course (see the Undergraduate
Catalog). In addition, academic disciplines can
incorporate class activities such as the following
to support integration of effective writing into
specific courses.
These
strategies assume, first, that one of the best
ways to encourage students to learn the content
of any discipline is to have them write about
it; second, that the ability to write well must
be learned by constantly engaging in the process
of writing in courses across the college or university
curriculum. |
| |
|
| |
Connections |
| |
Provide
students with the beginning and end of a process,
a causal relationship, or an argument. In scientific
or technical courses it may be the beginning and
end of a design process (the problem and a potential
solution), or the beginning and end of a chemical
experiment. In math courses, it may be the beginning
and end of a proof. In social sciences it may be
the hypothesis and potential results from an experiment
or the proposition and conclusion of an ideological
argument. In a history course, you may give students
two potentially related events in history. In an
English course you may present students with a character
and a character's actions. Have students get into
groups and trace or explain the how the two elements
are related or how one leads to the other. (This
may look like a series of propositions, calculations,
processes, or personal choices). Ask one member of
each small group to share his or her findings with
the entire class. Note: students can be asked to
write out their responses before class, as homework. |
| |
|
| |
Unresolved
Lab or Shop Problems |
| |
At
the end of a lab or shop period, have students write
a list of difficulties or problems encountered during
the period. Then have students exchange these problem
descriptions and spend 5 minutes helping each other
solve their respective problems. Unresolved problems
should be handed in for discussion. |
| |
|
| |
Debate
on Propositions |
| |
On
the board, put several pairs of opposing propositions
related to the topic of the day or the readings (or
propositions that articulate possible outcomes of
experiments, solutions to problems, or proposed methods
of design, for example). Have students individually
write for three minutes either supporting or refuting
one of the propositions. Then pair students up with
someone who wrote on the opposing proposition and
ask students to take 1 minute to present their argument.
Then ask students to respond to their partners. |
| |
|
| |
Mini-Cases |
| |
Design
short, stimulating case problems from the subject
matter. Ask students to respond to the case in one
page. You may consider designing the case so that
students write letters or other documents to "real" audiences.
Then get students into pairs and have them discuss
their documents with each other. |
| |
|
| |
Exam
Preparation |
| |
Circulate
a list of conceptually difficult questions focusing
on the material in a unit, course, etc. Ask students
to write 1/2-1 page explanations for each question.
In class, have the students work in groups or pairs;
they must read each other's explanations and discuss
any differences they see between them. In a follow-up
discussion with the entire class, ask for consensus
on the toughest questions; then lead a discussion
from students' explanations, clarifying where needed
and reviewing the material.
Two
or three class periods before each exam in the
course, have students bring in questions they
have generated from the course material. If the
exam uses essay topics, students must generate
one such topic. If the exam uses objective-type
questions (multiple-choice, true-false, etc.),
students must generate three such questions.
When the students arrive, they form small groups
of three or four and exchange questions. Working
their way through the questions, the students
discuss possible answers (for essays) or try
answering the objective questions and explain
their answers to each other. The instructor chooses
the best question or two from each group to include
on the exam. |
| |
|
| |
Web
Search |
| |
After
attending a class or doing a reading assignment,
students search the Web for anything that connects
in some way with the material. Students must bring
in a print-out of the relevant page(s) at the site
and then write up a brief summary of how the web
source connects to the reading. |
| |
|
 |
Resources |
| |
UMUC
Resources |
| |
http://www.umuc.edu/prog/ugp/ewp_writingcenter/writinggde/welcome.shtml |
| |
(UMUC's
own Guide to Effective Writing) |
| |
|
| |
http://www.umuc.edu/prog/ugp/ewp_writingcenter/wc_home.html
(UMUC's Effective Writing Center - On-line) |
| |
|
| |
http://www.inform.umd.edu/EdRes/Colleges/ARHU/Depts/English/Resources/WritCenter/ |
| |
(UMCP's
on-site Writing Center - students from UMUC may use
this center and may arrange visits by visiting the
web site) |
| |
|
| |
FAQ's,
Guidelines and General Help |
| |
http://cstw.ohio-state.edu/wac/wac_faq.htm
(Good general information source from Ohio State) |
| |
|
| |
http://cisw.cla.umn.edu/faculty/wicourses/guidelines.html
(Great set of guidelines from U. of Minnesota) |
| |
|
| |
http://mwp01.mwp.hawaii.edu/wi-hallmarks.htm
(University of Hawaii guidelines - excellent) |
| |
|
| |
http://wac.colostate.edu/exchange/
(Colorado State is home to the WAC Clearinghouse - the
Teacher Exchange has sample exercises and tips for
using writing in every discipline) |
| |
|
| |
Other
Helpful Sites |
| |
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/
(Every kind of on-line assistance for every kind of discipline
- especially good with sciences and technologies) |
| |
|
| |
http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/CWSP/
(Campus Writing and Speaking Program at NC State University
- great resources and structure) |
| |
|
| |
http://www.siu.edu/departments/cac/
(wonderful WAC/CAC site at Southern Illinois - lots of
resources) |
| |
|
| |
http://www.sfasu.edu/lalac/
(The Language and Learning Across the Curriculum Site -a
mother lode of information for using writing, speaking,
and communicating by other media in the disciplines) |